Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve OwnCloud Rock-on Messaging #829

Closed
vinima opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Improve OwnCloud Rock-on Messaging #829

vinima opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vinima
Copy link

vinima commented Aug 25, 2015

  1. During the OwnCloud installation process, it is recommended that shares such as owncloud-db, owncloud-config etc, be created. However, the size is not recommended. It is assumed that the size will be default to the size of the pool. It will be useful to have size recommendations on the tool-tip.
  2. I ran across strange behavior while installing OwnCloud. Later I noticed that I was warned about this. So, can you please put this line in BOLD RED to draw attention : "We strongly recommend creating dedicated Share assignments. If a Config or Data Share is assigned to more than one Rock-on, it could cause strange behavior".
  3. It is recommended that three folders be created for OwnCloud installation - DB Storage, Data Storage, Config Storage, but the message "To create needed Storage(Shares) and come back, click here." takes you back just once, forcing you to remember the folder names. If you don't remember, it causes lot of back and forth.
@vinima
Copy link
Author

vinima commented Aug 25, 2015

The above improvements apply to Syncthing Rock-on too.

@vinima
Copy link
Author

vinima commented Aug 25, 2015

These apply to Transmission Rock-on too.

@schakrava schakrava added this to the Tenaya milestone Dec 12, 2015
@schakrava schakrava self-assigned this Dec 12, 2015
@schakrava schakrava modified the milestones: Yosemite, Tenaya Dec 29, 2015
@phillxnet phillxnet removed this from the Yosemite milestone Jan 23, 2021
@Hooverdan96
Copy link
Member

@FroggyFlox if we still need this "information" we should probably move this to the Rockon section ... or, if the Rockon framework requests for being able to use multiple shares, defining folders (e.g. #2258) will be taken up, this might become obsolete, too --> so could roll this issue into the folder enhancement request?

@FroggyFlox
Copy link
Member

@Hooverdan96, thanks for flagging this!

I actually believe this is now addressed by #2481 (see #2064 for an expanded rationale). As you do mention, though, this would be further improved by #2258.
I'm thus closing this as fixed by #2481.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants