-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 777
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong handle is being focused, when crossing #298
Comments
byCedric Thanks for your report. The logic is correct at here, when you move across handle, actually the first handle is stoped at the second handle start point, then what you are draging is actually the second handle. That is to say, when you move across handles, there is a active handle exchange happened, but users may not notice that, they looks like the first hanlde is acrosss the second. But there do have bug as you report, the active handle state did't exchange correctly. Since this bug is not very crucial,and i am busy right now, i will handle this when i got time. PS. PR is welcome ~ |
and it seems not support keyboardEvent to move handles. should it do ? |
@Robin-front I was the one who implemented it for simple sliders in PR #282. Because of this issue I withheld the implementation for ranges. I will add the PR for keyboard support in ranges tonight (GMT +02:00), because this is now a separate issue. @paranoidjk If you think its wise to not yet support keyboard for ranges because of this, you can decline the coming PR. 😉 |
I was working on implementing keyboard support for the Range sliders as well. But as previously stated in the issue #131, I encountered some issues when using multiple handles within a Range slider.
Take a look at this:
What I'm doing here is moving the handle, with the mouse, across the other handle. The tooltip is being rendered correctly, but unfortunately the "focus" is left on the wrong handle. Or, the wrong handle is being moved. For mouse control this isn't much big of a deal, but for keyboard control its really not that great.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: