Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Encourage (require?) use of fs for path handling functions internally #531

Closed
jennybc opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1267
Closed

Encourage (require?) use of fs for path handling functions internally #531

jennybc opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1267
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement paths 🚶‍♂️ tooling 🔨 Internal usethis tooling

Comments

@jennybc
Copy link
Member

jennybc commented Dec 4, 2018

Along these lines: r-lib/fs#85

Experience is showing that It requires ongoing vigilance to be consistent about this.
@hadley hadley added feature a feature request or enhancement tooling 🔨 Internal usethis tooling labels Jan 4, 2019
@jennybc jennybc added this to the v1.5.0 milestone Mar 28, 2019
@hadley hadley modified the milestones: v1.5.0, Backlog Apr 3, 2019
@jennybc jennybc removed this from the Backlog milestone Apr 10, 2019
@jennybc jennybc added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Oct 28, 2020
@hadley hadley modified the milestone: v2.0.0 Oct 29, 2020
This was referenced Nov 2, 2020
Closed
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement paths 🚶‍♂️ tooling 🔨 Internal usethis tooling
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Use lintr to watch out for base file system functions r-lib/usethis
2 participants
@hadley @jennybc