We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A pattern seen a lot in formula.tools:
formula.tools
https://github.com/decisionpatterns/formula.tools/blob/45b6654e4d8570cbaf1e2fd527652471202d97ad/tests/testthat/test-lhs.r#L13
lhs( NA ~ . ) %>% expect_equal(NA)
IMO this is not the best way to write tests, but nevertheless we shouldn't trigger a lint with yoda_test_linter().
yoda_test_linter()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
closed by #1065
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
A pattern seen a lot in
formula.tools
:https://github.com/decisionpatterns/formula.tools/blob/45b6654e4d8570cbaf1e2fd527652471202d97ad/tests/testthat/test-lhs.r#L13
IMO this is not the best way to write tests, but nevertheless we shouldn't trigger a lint with
yoda_test_linter()
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: