Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create new general 'help' entry in Help menu / add a new 'manual' one proper to Pd's manual #15

Open
porres opened this issue Nov 21, 2021 · 9 comments

Comments

@porres
Copy link
Collaborator

porres commented Nov 21, 2021

This can be a quick overview of 'Pd Help'/Documentation, a 'Welcome to Pd' section of some sort. We can write a prototype for 'pd help' here: https://nc.nubegris.com.ar/index.php/s/5z4GMqa5HKdj3Lm

prior discussion in #13

@porres
Copy link
Collaborator Author

porres commented Nov 21, 2021

I already wrote a preliminary prototype in that link. I'm basically referring to and explaining all options in the Help Menu, plus telling people to join the mailing list for help as well.

Now, currently, besides the mailing list, there's also a facebook group, a telegram group, a discord channel and the old Pd forum. I guess we can refer to all of these options as well here and maybe somewhere else (in Pd's manual in puredata.info)

@Lucarda
Copy link
Collaborator

Lucarda commented Nov 21, 2021

besides the mailing list, there's also a facebook group, a telegram group, a discord channel and the old Pd forum. I guess we can refer to all of these options as well

Yes I think this is where they should go. also https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/

@umlaeute
Copy link

wouldn't it be easier to just link to https://puredata.info/community : this way we can update the list without needing to change the Pd sources.

the page itself doesn't look super modern, but we/I could provide a more generic link that redirects to whatever page we want)

@Lucarda
Copy link
Collaborator

Lucarda commented Nov 22, 2021

wouldn't it be easier to just link to https://puredata.info/community : this way we can update the list without needing to change the Pd sources.

agree.

the page itself doesn't look super modern, but we/I could provide a more generic link that redirects to whatever page we want)

we should consider creating a https://pages.github.com/ for pure-data/pure-data if we need a better looking (just like the manual?) to start including latest updates (of whatever release) not touching the source code (wich i think is nicer). This could be a nice place for things we plan to add on #14.

@Lucarda
Copy link
Collaborator

Lucarda commented Nov 22, 2021

May be if we have the "github pages" it makes more sence to have the ability to edit files in .md and compile them to .html like in #10 with pandoc

EDIT: Having the .css file in a fixed URL helps a lot.

@umlaeute
Copy link

we should consider creating a https://pages.github.com/

i'm not super-excited about tying more of Pd's services to github (i understand that https://puredata.info is not exactly fast to adopt and a beast to overhaul, but i'm a hard believer in self-hosted internet)

EDIT: Having the .css file in a fixed URL helps a lot.

i don't know what that means in this context.

@Lucarda
Copy link
Collaborator

Lucarda commented Nov 23, 2021

but i'm a hard believer in self-hosted internet

can we host @ IEM?

and make PRs to IEM gitlab?

and avoid using githubpages.

EDIT: Having the .css file in a fixed URL helps a lot.

i don't know what that means in this context.

This in the context of editing .md files and converting them to .html with pandoc.
Having a fixed place for the .css works in your local machine (when you are previewing/editing) and it also works when the file is in the server.

See https://github.com/Lucarda/Lucarda.github.io/blob/main/pandoc-and-reference/template.txt

giving the .css an URL does the magic.

@danomatika
Copy link

danomatika commented Nov 23, 2021 via email

@danomatika
Copy link

danomatika commented Nov 23, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants