Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add a powertag to write more explanatory titles for display in grids? #1063

Closed
ebarry opened this issue Dec 5, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed
Labels
add-code-links break-me-up break up for cleaner code separation, discrete tests, and, easier and iterative collaboration enhancement explains that the issue is to improve upon one of our existing features help wanted requires help by anyone willing to contribute

Comments

@ebarry
Copy link
Member

ebarry commented Dec 5, 2016

Problem

I am working on making a great method page (https://publiclab.org/tools) that i can show people as an example. For simplicity, i've been working on https://publiclab.org/wiki/coqui.

On that page, the activity grid (https://publiclab.org/notes/liz/08-30-2016/check-out-these-activity-grids) is working well:

screen shot 2016-12-05 at 3 57 12 pm

but i notice that directly below the grid all there's a lot of repeat links, basically it's what was on this page before there was an activity grid:

screen shot 2016-12-05 at 4 08 31 pm

screen shot 2016-12-05 at 3 57 25 pm

Actually, as I look at it, i think that the old way is easier to understand because the activities are introduced in a particular order, and with explanatory text that is more helpful than the actual title of any given post.

Part of the problem may be that the title of any particular post might not be understandable to someone new reading it and getting started, but only the author can edit them.

Proposed solution

But using Power Tags (https://publiclab.org/wiki/power-tags) we could add an "additional attribute" to this pre-existing content.

In this issue I am suggesting that we should create a powertag to add an additional field to activity grids offering an additional, a more explanatory title for each linked note.

Walkthrough

So someone who's not the original author but who is working on organizing this research area might:

  1. see that the title isn't optimal for the grid display
  2. go to that post (link to post) and think of a new title that would work better
  3. add that via a power tag like grid-title:<lalala>
  4. the grid would show the powertag-based title instead of the original

Another part of the solution is ordering the activities with a powertag, (like in #766).

Code links

Help me find where the relevant code is, @jywarren (or @publiclab/reviewers)

@jywarren jywarren added break-me-up break up for cleaner code separation, discrete tests, and, easier and iterative collaboration enhancement explains that the issue is to improve upon one of our existing features help wanted requires help by anyone willing to contribute labels Dec 6, 2016
@jywarren jywarren added this to the Activity grids milestone Dec 6, 2016
@Pk13055
Copy link
Contributor

Pk13055 commented Dec 21, 2016

@ebarry Has this issue/feature been resolved yet? I would like to help out if required.

@arkokoley
Copy link

@ebarry Has this issue been resolved yet? I would like to take on this, if its still open.

@ebarry
Copy link
Member Author

ebarry commented Mar 9, 2017

@jywarren is there anything else going on that affects our ability to move on this?

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

So, we have a "suggested title" feature in comments, although I worry it is fragile and maybe broken? I wonder if we should close this and open an issue for fixing the suggested title comment feature and protecting it with a system test! I'm going to close this and if you're interested, please do this!

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
add-code-links break-me-up break up for cleaner code separation, discrete tests, and, easier and iterative collaboration enhancement explains that the issue is to improve upon one of our existing features help wanted requires help by anyone willing to contribute
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants