From b25d0199683fba89399c34efdab6af103c799517 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Em <194856901+EmAtPrivacyGuides@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:49:12 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update blog/posts/the-future-of-privacy.md Co-authored-by: Jonah Aragon Signed-off-by: Em <194856901+EmAtPrivacyGuides@users.noreply.github.com> --- blog/posts/the-future-of-privacy.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/posts/the-future-of-privacy.md b/blog/posts/the-future-of-privacy.md index 8c33636847..37a9cabb7c 100644 --- a/blog/posts/the-future-of-privacy.md +++ b/blog/posts/the-future-of-privacy.md @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Harmful policies such as Chat Control are a direct example of how politics can a Another potent example of the *protecting-the-children stratagem* to undermine privacy rights is [Age Verification legislation](https://www.jonaharagon.com/posts/age-verification-is-incompatible-with-the-internet/). In the past few years, this idea of controlling which online content should be accessible to children has raised new proposals around the world. -Age Verification policies generally start with the premise that some content should not be accessible to children online. Again, this could seem like a reasonable idea at first. Nobody would debate that children should be shielded from some type of content. Sadly, we have all witnessed how horrifying the internet can be at time. However, both the premise and methodology to achieve this goal are wrong. +Age Verification policies generally start with the premise that some content should not be accessible to children online. Again, this could seem like a reasonable idea at first. Nobody would debate that children should be shielded from some type of content. Sadly, we have all witnessed how horrifying the internet can be at times. However, both the premise and methodology to achieve this goal are wrong. ### Who will decide what content should be walled online?