Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
Thanks for bringing up this issue; it's truly a concern for this repo now. We lack sufficient developers or maintainers to drive the repo to improve continuously. I'm willing to contribute, but with Darwinia's current focus on dapp development and integration, I have to address some dapp issues and don't have extra time to develop features for this repo. I can handle necessary bug fixes and PR reviews. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am using Frontier in our parachain development. It seems like the development of I am interested in contributing to Frontier, but the current development and feedback cycle seems taking time, making it challenging to directly push code into the main repository. As a result, I’ve been considering forking the project instead. If there is an active group contributing to Frontier, I’d love to discuss and collaborate on improving it together. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since frontier is going to have another audit soonm we (at MSL) will try to push our cherry-picks upstream. Many people are using MSL fork of frontier but I think we should try to rely on the official repo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi folks,
For Moonbeam we have a lot of custom changes and while we are happy to contribute to the main frontier, it is becoming harder, specially with less people having ability and time to review/merge those.
I don't know if @sorpaas is still around but if not I'd suggest we start to think of a new direction for Frontier. Some parachain are already using Moonbeam's fork of Frontier for their production runtime so we should find a solution to keep frontier maintainable and consistent with every parachain using it.
Let me know what you think.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions