Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
Hi @eristavi Thanks for your feature request. Still, I do like the idea so I will add it in the pipeline for future discussion (after Pods 2.8 at least). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Definitely something to think about in the future. With the new Pods Blocks, it's kind of the best of both worlds there too. We'll have to explore this idea further a bit later. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have some initial code for a Block Editor powered Pods Template screen. It's going to take more work to get it finished and make sure it can support new Pods conditional/each blocks that match the shortcodes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Given that the Gutenberg editor is the standard for WordPress content creation, there really is no alternative to providing a Gutenberg-compatible interface in the long run IMHO. I see the pickle you're in, since it will be very hard, if not impossible, to migrate Pods to the "Gutenberg way" in a backwards-compatible manner. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Gutenberg is still only partially supported by many tools, including even WooCommerce which is maintained by Automattic.
What do you mean here? We fully support Gutenberg. Only the Pods Templates are code based. We even include blocks that you can use. In general. Our templates are simply post types so enabling Gutenberg isn't the issue here. The issue is the amount of blocks available and the limitations in dynamic functionality of these blocks. Most blocks are simply static content with some UI editing capability. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Problem
Currently, Pods Template System has a nice html editor what I find very intuitive however, now that we have an option for using Gutenberg blocks, I believe Pods Templates could benefit from it very much.
Are there any specific thoughts about it for future release?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions