You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This library looks awesome, nice work!
I'd really like to use it to replace our existing implementation, but we currently use SQS and a database as Transports. Are there any plans to support SQS/Database as Transports in enqueue, or would PR's be considered?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is a plan but to be honest I would not expect it any time soon. We use RabbitMQ via AMQP so there is no need for SQS at the moment. If we find a customer who needs Enqueue and SQS we certainly add it.
@bendavies In dbal transport we tried to support delivery guaranty (If a consumer fails the message is get back to the queue and marked redelivered).
That was hardest part. The currently visible solution is no go solution. It simply returns messages to queue after some period of time 2 minutes. So if a consumer takes more that that time to process a message you are in trouble.
We worked on another more sophisticated solution but they have not even merged that to master yet.
I would suggest to completely drop the support of the feature for DBAL transport. It makes it simpler, less deadlocks, better performance and so on.
Hey!
This library looks awesome, nice work!
I'd really like to use it to replace our existing implementation, but we currently use SQS and a database as Transports. Are there any plans to support SQS/Database as Transports in enqueue, or would PR's be considered?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: