You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've used spring content 1.2.2 version so far, and I've just updated to a newer version in our project, which includes the changes from this Feature/PR.
Since then spring content directly depends on logback, so it appeared in our classpath, however our project isn't using logback but other SL4J implementation. I know it’s not a big deal, I can easily exclude the dependency out, but from such a nice framework, I would expect not force me to take such unnecessary steps.
I've just looked at the PR related to the above mentioned feature, but from that I feel the test scope would meets the purpose, but that's just a guess.
What is your opinion?
Do you think I need to live together with the dependency exclusion? Or am i on a completely wrong track? :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the report @janossch . I think this was just an oversight on my part. As a rule I havent put dependencies in the part pom. I'll take a look at this for the next release.
Hi @andye2004 and @paulcwarren
I've used spring content 1.2.2 version so far, and I've just updated to a newer version in our project, which includes the changes from this Feature/PR.
Since then spring content directly depends on logback, so it appeared in our classpath, however our project isn't using logback but other SL4J implementation. I know it’s not a big deal, I can easily exclude the dependency out, but from such a nice framework, I would expect not force me to take such unnecessary steps.
So until now our pom.xml looked like this
If i would like to jump to the newer version I need the following workaround:
I've just looked at the PR related to the above mentioned feature, but from that I feel the test scope would meets the purpose, but that's just a guess.
What is your opinion?
Do you think I need to live together with the dependency exclusion? Or am i on a completely wrong track? :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: