Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Funds not trapped after polkadotXcm.Attempted returns FailedToTransactAsset #3797

Open
2 tasks done
Juanma0x opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done
Labels
I2-bug The node fails to follow expected behavior. T6-XCM This PR/Issue is related to XCM.

Comments

@Juanma0x
Copy link

Is there an existing issue?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Experiencing problems? Have you tried our Stack Exchange first?

  • This is not a support question.

Description of bug

The XCM extrinxic 6353817-2 in Kusama Asset Hub resulted in an Attempted FailedToTransactAsset error because the account tried to transfer all transferable funds.

Due to the limitations of the new delivery fees manager, the funds should have been trapped but were instead just withdrawn.

Related:
#690
#3434
#3450

This could impact the total issuance.

Steps to reproduce

No response

@Juanma0x Juanma0x added I2-bug The node fails to follow expected behavior. I10-unconfirmed Issue might be valid, but it's not yet known. labels Mar 22, 2024
@acatangiu acatangiu added the T6-XCM This PR/Issue is related to XCM. label Mar 22, 2024
@franciscoaguirre franciscoaguirre moved this from Draft to Backlog in Parity Roadmap Mar 28, 2024
@acatangiu acatangiu moved this from Backlog to Next to pick up in Parity Roadmap Mar 28, 2024
@Juanma0x
Copy link
Author

Juanma0x commented Apr 4, 2024

I'll add another case that might be affected by the same bug:

Transactions failed in Polkado Asset Hub:
https://assethub-polkadot.subscan.io/xcm_message/polkadot-57b7063a03798764c36226132fae6145f7b150b4

I don't see any "trapped" balance. The sender account had enough to pay for the fees in ACA, and some DOT (0.016 DOT) were transferred to pay for the destination fee.

According to Joe, 0.016 DOT were not enough and the balance dropped below the ED.

@franciscoaguirre franciscoaguirre removed the I10-unconfirmed Issue might be valid, but it's not yet known. label Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I2-bug The node fails to follow expected behavior. T6-XCM This PR/Issue is related to XCM.
Projects
Status: Next to pick up
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants