[Poll] Recommendation Download Format

[jonaharagon]

Quick question, are downloads more readable/useful when they are included inside the recommendation card (1) or when they are their own section (2)? Poll at bottom of post.

1:

2:

[jonaharagon]

People read websites in an F pattern, changing download links to a list format (2) would probably make the downloads list easier to quickly scan for your preferred platform.

[Dyrimon]

Won't using option 2 make the page too long to scroll down? But it does make it easy for fat-fingered mobile users to navigate, when the download sources are long, as @1hiking remarked, for Bitwarden.

[1hiking]

If possible, a toggle could be added to expand/collapse lists.

[jonaharagon]

@Dyrimon is there a downside to longer pages though?

[ghost]

Collapsable lists are def. the way to go

[Dyrimon]

@Dyrimon is there a downside to longer pages though?

It could be in smartphone. I currently don't have one to test but it won't be that much of a problem in PC

[jonaharagon]

Is this better or worse than the existing download links?

https://s3.us-central-1.wasabisys.com/aragon-dropshare/Screen-Recording-2022-04-22-15-49-54.mp4

I suppose it could still be within the card too

https://s3.us-central-1.wasabisys.com/aragon-dropshare/Screen-Recording-2022-04-22-15-52-49.mp4

[ghost]

I suppose it could still be within the card too

I prefer this

[ghost]

Do u know if GitHub removes the Exif data when u upload it directly?

Nope, they don't. It's a raw upload — no compression or anything.

[efb4f5ff-1298-471a-8973-3d47447115dc]

Ok thanks. Maybe something to note that there is a size limit for uploading a video. I thought it was 25MB

[ghost]

yeah i don't think github is trying to be a video streaming service 😛

[Dyrimon]

Collapsible within card is better

[dngray]

Cards now have collapsible downloads.