You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running the DSWx-NI SAS Interface delivery on an Intel-based EC2 instance (for example c6i.2xlarge), the comparison of output and expected products using the dswx_comparison.py script produces the following comparison failures:
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B01_WTR.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B01_WTR.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Water classification (WTR)"
/data/home/collinss/OPERA/DSWx-NI/interface/0.1/dswx_comparison.py:59: RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in ubyte_scalars
if (abs(image_1[i, j] - image_2[i, j]) >=
* input 1 has value "0" in position (x: 2615, y: 460) whereas input 2 has value "1" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B02_BWTR.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B02_BWTR.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Binary Water classification (BWTR)"
/data/home/collinss/OPERA/DSWx-NI/interface/0.1/dswx_comparison.py:59: RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in ubyte_scalars
if (abs(image_1[i, j] - image_2[i, j]) >=
* input 1 has value "0" in position (x: 2615, y: 460) whereas input 2 has value "1" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B03_CONF.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B03_CONF.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Confidence values (CONF)"
* input 1 has value "2" in position (x: 2610, y: 313) whereas input 2 has value "1" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLS_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Diagnostic layer (DIAG)"
/data/home/collinss/OPERA/DSWx-NI/interface/0.1/dswx_comparison.py:59: RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in ubyte_scalars
if (abs(image_1[i, j] - image_2[i, j]) >=
* input 1 has value "99" in position (x: 2527, y: 0) whereas input 2 has value "100" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B01_WTR.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B01_WTR.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Water classification (WTR)"
* input 1 has value "1" in position (x: 2260, y: 68) whereas input 2 has value "0" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B02_BWTR.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B02_BWTR.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Binary Water classification (BWTR)"
* input 1 has value "1" in position (x: 2260, y: 68) whereas input 2 has value "0" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B03_CONF.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B03_CONF.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Confidence values (CONF)"
* input 1 has value "6" in position (x: 3617, y: 16) whereas input 2 has value "0" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SLT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Diagnostic layer (DIAG)"
* input 1 has value "54" in position (x: 2046, y: 0) whereas input 2 has value "51" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMS_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMS_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Diagnostic layer (DIAG)"
/data/home/collinss/OPERA/DSWx-NI/interface/0.1/dswx_comparison.py:59: RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in ubyte_scalars
if (abs(image_1[i, j] - image_2[i, j]) >=
* input 1 has value "89" in position (x: 33, y: 0) whereas input 2 has value "90" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B01_WTR.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B01_WTR.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Water classification (WTR)"
* input 1 has value "1" in position (x: 343, y: 338) whereas input 2 has value "0" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B02_BWTR.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B02_BWTR.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Binary Water classification (BWTR)"
* input 1 has value "1" in position (x: 343, y: 338) whereas input 2 has value "0" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B03_CONF.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B03_CONF.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Confidence values (CONF)"
* input 1 has value "6" in position (x: 285, y: 16) whereas input 2 has value "0" in the same position.
Comparing files:
file 1: sample_data/expected_output/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240329T181033Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
file 2: sample_data/output_dir/OPERA_L3_DSWx-NI_T11SMT_20110226T061749Z_20240402T154233Z_LSAR_30_v0.1_B04_DIAG.tif
[OK]Comparing number of bands
Comparing DSWx bands...
[FAIL] Band 1 - Diagnostic layer (DIAG)"
* input 1 has value "50" in position (x: 25, y: 0) whereas input 2 has value "47" in the same position.
When running the same test and comparisons on an AMD-based EC2 instance (c6a.2xlarge), all tests pass cleanly. This indicates that the DSWX-SAR code is susceptible to floating point precision/rounding errors between Intel and AMD, giving slightly different (incorrect?) values on Intel machines. Note that similar behavior has also been observed when running the DSWx-S1 SAS.
This is a potential issue since we sometimes allocate both Intel and AMD instance types in the same auto-scaling worker pool in the OPERA SDS.
A set of sample DSWx-NI outputs generated on an Intel instance can be downloaded from s3://opera-dev-lts-fwd-collinss/acceptance_test/dswx_ni/interface_0.1/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When running the DSWx-NI SAS Interface delivery on an Intel-based EC2 instance (for example c6i.2xlarge), the comparison of output and expected products using the
dswx_comparison.py
script produces the following comparison failures:When running the same test and comparisons on an AMD-based EC2 instance (c6a.2xlarge), all tests pass cleanly. This indicates that the DSWX-SAR code is susceptible to floating point precision/rounding errors between Intel and AMD, giving slightly different (incorrect?) values on Intel machines. Note that similar behavior has also been observed when running the DSWx-S1 SAS.
This is a potential issue since we sometimes allocate both Intel and AMD instance types in the same auto-scaling worker pool in the OPERA SDS.
A set of sample DSWx-NI outputs generated on an Intel instance can be downloaded from s3://opera-dev-lts-fwd-collinss/acceptance_test/dswx_ni/interface_0.1/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: