Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IED doesn't support Functional Naming/ConfldName #1402

Closed
DavoodSooran opened this issue Dec 22, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

IED doesn't support Functional Naming/ConfldName #1402

DavoodSooran opened this issue Dec 22, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@DavoodSooran
Copy link
Contributor

DavoodSooran commented Dec 22, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

As a 104 Engineer, I aim to modify the ldName associated with a particular LDevice. Presently, CoMPAS lacks support for this functionality, necessitating the inclusion of ldName configuration within the tool. Below outlines the steps involved in configuring and altering the ldName.

It's important to note that we don't want users to modify the inst of an LDevice. Changing the ldInst might create inconsistencies across the entire SCD file. Only modifications to ldName are permitted.

Another ticket has been created for developing this feature, which can be found below. We've clearly explained how this function can operate in that ticket. Please refer to it for more detailed information. #1326 (comment)

Describe the solution you'd like

It's crucial to note that the availability of the dialog box is contingent upon the presence of the ConfLdName service within the services section of the SCD file. In the event that this service is absent, users should still have access to the dialog box. However, in this scenario, all parameters will be displayed in a grayed-out and disabled state, preventing any modifications. This limited functionality allows users only to view the current ldName and inst without the ability to make changes. An example of the services section from an SCD file is displayed below.

image

To provide users with more context regarding the grayed-out ldName, it would be advantageous to include additional information below the ldName, similar to the description provided for the desc parameter. In the accompanying image, this supplementary information is visible beneath the ldName.

In this scenario, a comment similar to the following examples would be ideal:

1- IED doesn't support Functional Naming
2- IED doesn't support ConfldName service
3- IED doesn't support Functional Naming (ConfldName service)

@DavoodSooran
Copy link
Contributor Author

DavoodSooran commented Dec 22, 2023

@Sander3003 It can be done in the first sprint of the upcoming year.

@DavoodSooran DavoodSooran added Status: Ready for development Checked by all co-developers and removed Status: Ready for development Checked by all co-developers labels Dec 22, 2023
@juancho0202 juancho0202 added this to Next Jan 10, 2024
@juancho0202 juancho0202 moved this to In Progress in Next Jan 10, 2024
@Sander3003
Copy link
Member

It is done

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Next Feb 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants