Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protocol 104: Change options between different TI's when selecting a DOI #1375

Closed
Stef3st opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1380
Closed

Protocol 104: Change options between different TI's when selecting a DOI #1375

Stef3st opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1380
Labels
Kind: Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Stef3st
Copy link
Contributor

Stef3st commented Nov 27, 2023

It is possible to be able to select multiple Ti's when adding a DOI. But all Ti's are bound to the same options.

When a DOI is a chosen a wizard pops up where a Ti number can be chosen. Below that are two switches that can be enabled and therefore used, or can be disabled, depending on if a Ti number allows that option. Right now it doesn't matter which Ti number you choose. If there's only 1 Ti number that allows an option, this option will be available for all Ti's in that DOI.

I would like to see a solution that the options are set for the chosen Ti number

@Stef3st Stef3st added the Kind: Bug Something isn't working label Nov 27, 2023
@DavoodSooran
Copy link
Contributor

@pascalwilbrink @Stef3st @juancho0202
FYI, the “Created Inverted Addresses (Monitor)“ feature is not applicable for the following ASDU/Ti numbers:

<20> := Packed single-point information with status change detection
<38> := Event of protection equipment with time tag CP56Time2a
<39> := Packed start events of protection equipment with time tag CP56Time2a
<40> := Packed output circuit information of protection equipment with time tag CP56Time2a

@juancho0202
Copy link
Contributor

Acceptance Criteria:

  • The inverted switch is succesfully disabled for the numbers provided by Davood

@DavoodSooran
Copy link
Contributor

DavoodSooran commented Dec 4, 2023

@juancho0202 @Stef3st

I have tested this issue for Ti: 39 and 40. It works quite good.
At the moment, the IEC 61850-80-1 has not introduced any CDCs for mapping to Ti: 20 and 38. So, we cannot test them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Kind: Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants