Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update to OpenAPI 3.1.x #585

Closed
deanurce opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

update to OpenAPI 3.1.x #585

deanurce opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
✨ enhancement New feature or improvement 🍭 OpenAPI Compliance Supporting a new bit of the OpenAPI spec

Comments

@deanurce
Copy link

deanurce commented Feb 7, 2022

Im trying to upgrade to openapi 3.1.0 to be able to use type: mutualTLS in the security scheme definition, and it throws an error that the version is not recognised.
Since the 3.1.0 upgrade has been around for quite some time, will it be supported anytime soon?

Screenshot of error below.
image

@deanurce deanurce added the ✨ enhancement New feature or improvement label Feb 7, 2022
@dbanty
Copy link
Collaborator

dbanty commented Feb 7, 2022

Actually supporting the features of 3.1.0 is probably a long way off since there are still 3.0 features incomplete 😬.

Reading the spec and just handling any breaking changes for the 3.0 features we do support is probably relatively easy, just a time investment.

I'm unlikely to have the time to do that anytime soon, but would welcome a PR from someone who does.

@philsturgeon
Copy link

The changes are not too major, just moving in line with JSON Schema for the schema objects and a few simplifications to examples. https://www.openapis.org/blog/2021/02/16/migrating-from-openapi-3-0-to-3-1-0

@dbanty dbanty added the 🍭 OpenAPI Compliance Supporting a new bit of the OpenAPI spec label Aug 13, 2023
@openapi-generators openapi-generators locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 13, 2023
@dbanty dbanty converted this issue into discussion #818 Aug 13, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
✨ enhancement New feature or improvement 🍭 OpenAPI Compliance Supporting a new bit of the OpenAPI spec
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants