Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sdk-node] allow multiple spanProcessors/logProcessors to be configured #4451

Closed
hectorhdzg opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4740
Closed

[sdk-node] allow multiple spanProcessors/logProcessors to be configured #4451

hectorhdzg opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4740

Comments

@hectorhdzg
Copy link
Member

hectorhdzg commented Jan 31, 2024

spanProcessors and logProcessors order is important when they are doing some modification of the actual span/log, allowing multiple ones will permit more specific scenarios.

@YunosukeY
Copy link

I think it would be nice if a metricReaders option is allowed as well.

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 14 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

This issue was closed because it has been stale for 14 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 13, 2024
@trentm
Copy link
Contributor

trentm commented May 31, 2024

Please correct me if I'm wrong. This issue is still relevant for allowing multiple logProcessors.

@trentm trentm reopened this May 31, 2024
@trentm trentm added never-stale and removed stale labels May 31, 2024
@trentm trentm linked a pull request May 31, 2024 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@hectorhdzg hectorhdzg added this to the Logs API/SDK GA milestone Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants