The OpenTelemetry collector has traces, metrics and logs as stable signals. We want to start experimenting with support for profiles as an experimental signal. But we also don't want to introduce breaking changes in packages otherwise considered stable.
This document describes:
- The approach we intend to take to introduce profiling with no breaking changes
- How the migration will happen once profiling goes stable
A first approach, discussed in issue 10207 has been discarded. It aimed to refactor the current packages with per-signal subpackages, so each subpackage could have its own stability level, like pdata does.
This has been discarded, as the Collector SIG does not want the profiling signal to impact the road to the collector reaching 1.0.
An approach would have been to use build tags to limit the availability of profiles within packages.
This approach would make the UX very bad though, as most packages are meant to be imported and not used in a compiled collector. It would therefore not have been possible to specify the appropriate build tags.
This has been discarded, as the usage would have been too difficult.
The proposed approach will consist of two main phases:
- Introduce
experimental
packages for each required module of the collector that needs to be profiles-aware.consumer
,receiver
,connector
,component
,processor
- Mark specific APIs as
experimental
in their godoc for parts that can't be a new package.service
Each package that needs to be profiling signal-aware will have its public methods and interfaces moves into an internal subpackage.
Then, the original package will get similar API methods and interfaces as the ones currently available on the main branch.
The profiling methods and interfaces will be made available in a profiles
subpackage.
See PR #10253 for an example.
In order to boot a functional collector with profiles support, some stable packages need to be aware of the experimental ones.
To support that case, we will mark new APIs as experimental
with go docs.
Every experimental API will be documented as such:
// # Experimental
//
// Notice: This method is EXPERIMENTAL and may be changed or removed in a
// later release.
As documented, APIs marked as experimental may changed or removed across releases, without it being considered as a breaking change.
There are no symbols that would need to be marked as experimental today. If there ever are then implementers may add an experimental comment to them
The user-specified configuration will let users specify a profiles
pipeline:
service:
pipelines:
profiles:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [otlp]
When an experimental signal is being used, the collector will log a warning at boot.
If the profiling signal becomes stable, all the experimental packages will be
merged back into their stable counterpart, and the service
module's imports
will be updated.
If the profiling signal is removed, all the experimental packages will be
removed from the repository, and support for them will be removed in the
service
module.