Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for an Instrumentation Semantic Conventions workgroup #803

Closed
alolita opened this issue Aug 9, 2021 · 15 comments
Closed

Request for an Instrumentation Semantic Conventions workgroup #803

alolita opened this issue Aug 9, 2021 · 15 comments
Assignees

Comments

@alolita
Copy link
Member

alolita commented Aug 9, 2021

A telemetry system is only as good as the data it emits. OpenTelemetry provides APIs for recording traces, metrics, and logs. Currently, only the tracing API is stable. The metrics API is expected to be stable at the end of 2021, followed by the logging API in Q1 of 2022.

For every type of common software component (HTTP, gRPC, SQL, Kafka, etc), OpenTelemetry also provides definitions for the specific keys and values which must be recorded. This ensures that the data OpenTelemetry produces is as useful as possible, and is consistent across languages and libraries. These definitions are called semantic conventions.

Today, these semantic conventions are incomplete. They must be reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure that the emitted data is high quality and correct, and the configuration options provide sufficient customization for real world usage. Until this happens, the semantic conventions are marked as experimental.

Once these conventions are stable, instrumentation must be written for every major open source framework and library. OpenTelemetry will not be fully mature until this instrumentation exists and becomes stable.

In this workgroup, we'd like to focus on defining semantic conventions for instrumentation.

The proposed time for this workgroup is: Mondays at 1130 AM - Noon Pacific Time.

For more details on Instrumentation semantic conventions work done so far, please see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gAD5wqqf74XNLtTL6CbB7kHfooh9kovbFI8pQhhYrzE/edit#

For general Instrumentation discussions so far, please see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YNRCg9fdjJgZRs56vvf7rfFPk06mhp781sWHYypOaAk/edit#heading=h.f7ta67ofb8f

For reference please see request for Instrumentation SIG at #802

cc: @pyohannes @productml-ai @jsuereth @tedsuo

@alolita
Copy link
Member Author

alolita commented Aug 9, 2021

Once approved, I can create the calendar event on the OTEL calendar.

@tedsuo
Copy link
Contributor

tedsuo commented Aug 10, 2021

That time slot works for me!

@jsuereth
Copy link
Contributor

Suprisingly, this works for me too! Looking forward to this sig.

@jamesmoessis
Copy link

Are there other APAC-friendly SIGs where the semantic convention is being discussed? There is significant interest in the semantic convention from my side, but this time (4.30am AEST) doesn't really work for APAC.

@cobly
Copy link

cobly commented Aug 12, 2021

I would also be interested in an Australian friendly time.

@hstan
Copy link

hstan commented Aug 12, 2021

I'm interested and also work from Australia (AEST)

@tedsuo
Copy link
Contributor

tedsuo commented Aug 12, 2021

FYI there is also an APAC-friendly meeting being discussed: #802

@jamesmoessis
Copy link

Great, I suppose the APAC folk can attend that one. Thanks @tedsuo!

@tedsuo
Copy link
Contributor

tedsuo commented Aug 16, 2021

No prob!

@Oberon00
Copy link
Member

Oberon00 commented Aug 17, 2021

Would this be a WG of the proposed instrumentation SIG (#802) or the existing spec SIG?

@ocelotl
Copy link

ocelotl commented Aug 17, 2021

😎

@pyohannes
Copy link
Contributor

Would this be a WG of the proposed instrumentation SIG (#802) or the existing spec SIG?

@Oberon00 This would be a workgroup of the instrumentation SIG proposed in #802.

@tedsuo
Copy link
Contributor

tedsuo commented Aug 26, 2021

I created the meetings for the Instrumentation SIG #819

@productml-ai
Copy link

Given that we have instrumentation SIG on Tuesday #802, it was discussed that we don't need the additional Monday 11:30 AM PST meeting. @alolita can assist with removing it from the public calendar?

@tedsuo
Copy link
Contributor

tedsuo commented Sep 21, 2021

Following up on this issue, now have an instrumentation SIG. We currently have two meetings per week; meeting details can be found on the OpenTelemetry calendar. (@productml-ai I've removed the Monday meeting from the calendar.)

Everyone interested, please join the #otel-instrumentation slack channel to get alerted to new issues/PRs and have async discussions.

@tedsuo tedsuo closed this as completed Sep 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests