Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better name for "Linked resources" #1127

Closed
jimsafley opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Better name for "Linked resources" #1127

jimsafley opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@jimsafley
Milestone
March 19

Comments

@jimsafley
Copy link
Member

See #1112
@jimsafley jimsafley added this to the November 13 milestone Oct 30, 2017
@jimsafley
Copy link
Member Author

Some alternatives we've considered:

  • What links to this?
  • Linking resources
  • Inbound/Incoming links/relations

I like "Linking resources" slightly better than "Linked resources" because it implies a subject relationship with the current resource. Styling (#1128) could go a long way to clarify the distinction.

@zerocrates zerocrates modified the milestones: November 13, December 11 Nov 27, 2017
@jimsafley jimsafley self-assigned this Dec 6, 2017
@jimsafley
Copy link
Member Author

Instead of changing the tab name let's just explain what it is above the content. Something like

The following resources link to this resource.

@zerocrates zerocrates modified the milestones: December 11, January 22 Jan 8, 2018
@zerocrates zerocrates modified the milestones: January 22, March 5 Feb 19, 2018
@zerocrates zerocrates modified the milestones: March 5, March 19 Mar 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jimsafley jimsafley

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
March 19
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jimsafley @zerocrates