Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Delete/Archive Button for Facility Locations #10551

Open
aravindm4 opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #10571
Open

Add Delete/Archive Button for Facility Locations #10551

aravindm4 opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #10571
Assignees

Comments

@aravindm4
Copy link

Currently, there is no option to delete facility locations from the system. To improve user management of facilities, a delete button should be added to locations within Facility settings.

Image

@tellmeY18 tellmeY18 moved this to Triage in Care Feb 11, 2025
@tellmeY18 tellmeY18 added this to Care Feb 11, 2025
@DonXavierdev
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to work on this

@tellmeY18 tellmeY18 moved this from Triage to In Progress in Care Feb 11, 2025
@DonXavierdev DonXavierdev linked a pull request Feb 12, 2025 that will close this issue
6 tasks
@vishwansh01
Copy link
Contributor

@tellmeY18 If no one's working on this , can you please assign this to me ?

@github-actions github-actions bot added needs-triage question Further information is requested labels Feb 20, 2025
@DonXavierdev
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @vishwansh01 thanks for checking in, The functionality is done here . There is some issue on the BE which prevents this PR to be merged so currently waiting on it.

@rithviknishad rithviknishad moved this from In Progress to Done in Care Feb 27, 2025
@nihal467 nihal467 removed question Further information is requested needs-triage labels Mar 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants