Define Working Group expectations and create boilerplate

[dshaw]

Attempting to integrate the TSC WORKING_GROUP.md doc, revealed some gaps between what we assert as CommComm contributions and how this is defined today for the Node.js project.

At the 2017-12-28 CommComm Meeting we identified the current boilerplate as a blocker for landing #194. This issue captures the intent to remove the Working Group bootstrap governance in the PR and collaborate here to create new definition in line with CommComm governance and contribution expectations.

CommComm Bootstrap Governance items to ratify or define:

• Define Working Group scope and authority
• Collaborators
• WG Membership
• WG Meetings
• Consensus Seeking Process
• Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
• Code of Conduct

[bnb]

@dshaw have there been any updates on this?

[bnb]

I'd like to add this to the agenda, it's come up a few times in the past two weeks.

[bnb]

Going to close this and re-open a new issue with a bit more focus (given the current state of things) and that can be labeled as "Good First Issue" for someone new to the project.