diff --git a/meetings/2017-10-11.md b/meetings/2017-10-11.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..38040056 --- /dev/null +++ b/meetings/2017-10-11.md @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +# Node Foundation TSC Meeting 2017-10-11 + +## Links + +* **Recording**: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90azeQn0H6w +* **GitHub Issue**: [TSC#377](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/3773) +* **Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PkoiLPj1b_ePtCL6IWDSwI-eh1Vzp7sfhu5deoiWM-A/edit?usp=sharing +* _Previous Minutes Google Doc: _ + +## Present + +* Franziska Hinkelmann @fhinkel (TSC) +* Joyee Cheung @joyeecheung (TSC) +* Matteo Collina @mcollina (TSC) +* Michael Dawson @mhdawson (TSC) +* Myles Borins @MylesBorins (TSC) +* Rod Vagg @rvagg (TSC) +* Rich Trott @Trott (TSC) +* Trevor Norris @trevnorris (TSC) + +* Gibson Fahnestock @gibfahn (Release WG delegate for update/observer) + +## Agenda + +## Announcements + +No announcements this week. + +### Workgroup Update + +#### Release Work Group + +* Major work, formal chartering of Release WG, Michael moved forward, + some cleanup still do to. +* v6.x release upcoming. +* Preparing for V8.x +* Gibson starting to take over LTS release, Myles will be mentoring +* Another focus is working towards sharing the backporting work so + that more people can do it. +* Last discussion was that it's likely too late for 6.2 in 8.x before + it goes LTS, but work is being done to see if it can be made + compatible for possible inclusion sometime when 8.x is in LTS. + +Extracted from **tsc-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting. + +### nodejs/build + +* https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15762 + * 8.7 has been updated to 6.1. + * has escape analysis turned off . + * due to security vulnerability, debate over whether it affects node + but that version is buggy so advice is that on any version lower + Than 6.2 it should be turned off. + * should we ship 8.7 with 6.1 ? + * question on whether we should temporary turn it back on ? + * Once we land 6.2 on master will start working to see if + it can be made abi compatible as a possibility to include + in a later LTS. + +* tmp dir needed on ubuntu 1604 and fedora23 [#873](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/873) + * wanted to bring to attention that readable stream has been broken + for 9 months. Patch landed on in ansible that might have fixed. + * problem that nobody has volunteered, does not feel that this + should have taken much effort. + * Maybe github issues are not working well as a cue for what + Needs to happen. + * Trevor, disconcerting that we are allowing changes in that + break things, in the past we would revert if patch broke + something, and then it would land later. + * Rod, does not think the fix is quite as simple. It would take + real time for somebody to go through and do the work. + * Rod, agrees that github may not have communicated the priority of + this + +### nodejs/node + +There were rolled over to the next meeting: + +* async_hooks: skip sanity checks when disabled [#15454](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15454) +* buffer: runtime-deprecate Buffer ctor by default [#15346](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15346) +* http: send 400 bad request on parse error [#15324](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15324) +* stream: move prefixed files into internal/streams. [#11957](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11957) + +### nodejs/TSC + +These were rolled over to the next meeting: + +* Who should be in @nodejs/security? Who should have access to the private repo? [#358](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/358) + +* Vote on the approach for https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/445 [#355](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/355) + * believe this has been settled in github + +### nodejs/admin + +* doc: doc expectations on TSC and CommComm members [#12](https://github.com/nodejs/admin/pull/12) + * at the summit, groups split out and filled in stickies, and the + Grouped on the wall. + * General hope was to do more in different areas (ex Australia, + China). + * Myles may try to run at NodeFest and over next few months + * Those who led, Sarah (new board member, Tracy etc will be pushing + forward). + * Assumption is that is is going to be a multi month effort. + * Michael: suggest that although it refers to Values, we likely + won't change the wording significantly based on what Values are + Documented. + * Rod, would it hamper technical discussion in the future that need + to be revisited in the future ? Will make a few specific + suggestions on the wording. + * Generally no objection to landing before values discussion closes + but we need input from CommComm as well. + +## Q&A, Other + +* No questions this week. + +## Upcoming Meetings + +* **Node.js Foundation Calendar**: https://nodejs.org/calendar + +Click `+GoogleCalendar` at the bottom right to add to your own Google calendar. +