Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIFTI volume preferred orientation #39 #2047

Closed
shilpitju opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

CIFTI volume preferred orientation #39 #2047

shilpitju opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@shilpitju
Copy link

Hi @effigies @mgxd ,

What are your suggestions to me now based on the reply in
CIFTI volume preferred orientation #39

Shall I use wb_command -cifti-resample or wait for an update in fmriprep?

Regards,

@mgxd
Copy link
Collaborator

mgxd commented Mar 23, 2020

We have released 20.1.0rc1 which now features CIFTI volume in LAS orientation.

@shilpitju
Copy link
Author

That's wonderful. I will wait for its official release.

@mgxd
Copy link
Collaborator

mgxd commented Mar 23, 2020

@shilpitju if you wouldn't mind, could you test out your data with 20.1.0rc1? It would be great to crowdsource some testing prior to the official release 😄

@mgxd mgxd closed this as completed Mar 23, 2020
@shilpitju
Copy link
Author

@mgxd I ran one of my datasets using 20.1.0rc1. Thereafter the MATLAB code to extract parcels using the ColeAnticevic_NetPartition which is in HCP CIfti DIDN'T GAVE ANY ERRORS of LAS-RAS mismatch.

Thanks so much. When is an official release expected?

@mgxd
Copy link
Collaborator

mgxd commented Mar 24, 2020

great to hear! there are some outstanding todos to hit, but sometime in april seems likely

@shilpitju
Copy link
Author

Alright.

@shilpitju
Copy link
Author

When is the official release expected? :)

Thanks

@oesteban
Copy link
Member

oesteban commented May 6, 2020

Expected: past week.
Actual: ASAP, but we'll run a lot of testing so maybe one or two weeks.

@shilpitju
Copy link
Author

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants