Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using exports field regardless of ESM #177

Closed
niksy opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider using exports field regardless of ESM #177

niksy opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@niksy
Copy link
Owner

niksy commented Oct 27, 2020

More expressive and standardised than main, module, browser and style.

@niksy
Copy link
Owner Author

niksy commented Aug 30, 2021

Since ESM packages are the only proper way forward and tooling is revolving around them, we should leave this as is and use only when producing ESM package.

@niksy niksy closed this as completed Aug 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant