Split out main processed data vs merged processed data

[anngvu]

For merged data files that aggregate samples into one file, we're just going to be on par with GDC, see:

close_mappings:
    - https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/Data_Dictionary/viewer/#?view=table-definition-view&id=aggregated_somatic_mutation
    - https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/Data_Dictionary/viewer/#?view=table-definition-view&id=gene_expression

[github-actions]

Test Suite Report

Template Generation

template	result	link
ClinicalAssayTemplate	😄	template link
EpigeneticsAssayTemplate	😄	template link
FlowCytometryTemplate	😄	template link
GenomicsAssayTemplate	😄	template link
GenomicsAssayTemplateExtended	😄	template link
ImagingAssayTemplate	😄	template link
LightScatteringAssayTemplate	😄	template link
MRIAssayTemplate	😄	template link
PharmacokineticsAssayTemplate	😄	template link
PlateBasedReporterAssayTemplate	😄	template link
ProcessedAlignedReadsTemplate	😄	template link
ProcessedExpressionTemplate	😄	template link
ProcessedVariantCallsTemplate	😄	template link
ProteomicsAssayTemplate	😄	template link
ProtocolTemplate	😄	template link
RNASeqTemplate	😄	template link
ScRNASeqTemplate	😄	template link
UpdateMilestoneReport	😄	template link
WESTemplate	😄	template link
WGSTemplate	😄	template link

Manifest Validation

manifest	result	expectation
GenomicsAssayTemplate_0.csv	😄	Lists can be blank if attr not required using ‘list like’ rule
GenomicsAssayTemplate_1.csv	😄	Mixing blanks and regular list values works
GenomicsAssayTemplate_2.csv	😄	Conditional validation for attributes is currently not supported
ScRNASeqTemplate_0.csv	😄	Single list val works by using ‘list like’ rule
ScRNASeqTemplate_1.csv	😄	Fail because of missing data in required field libraryStrand

[allaway]

This change makes sense to me, but I'd like others to weigh in too.

[cconrad8]

looks good to me

writing down just so we have on record - that a description of the templates would be helpful for the DCA to surface since these manifest titles are very similar