Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 21, 2020. It is now read-only.

SSG's beanchmarking #371

Open
matbrgz opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

SSG's beanchmarking #371

matbrgz opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@matbrgz
Copy link

matbrgz commented May 9, 2018

I understand that this is not a chat service and I do not intend to use it for that, my intentions are purely at the discretion of discussion and with the intention of opening a pull request.
Considering that the compilation time between the SGGs can vary and that science needs an open standard of categorization of data, experiments and benchmarking will be performed evaluating the static site generators in the compilation time period and verifying the behavior with 1000, 100000, 1000000 records of 10kb and 100kb. This will be able to discuss the operation of static site generators, the data categorization method used by these platforms and how this technology can benefit teaching by developing a tool for creating websites for teachers.
Do you think this test will work? I accept contributions.

@erquhart
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmarking would be cool, agreed, but it would take some work to get it going. It can't really happen in our build, probably not suitable for a continuous delivery platform like Netlify, so you'd really need a server somewhere with scripting to run all of these SSG's and stash the data somewhere. It'd need to be verifiable, too.

We can leave this open and see if anyone is interested in making it happen.

@matbrgz
Copy link
Author

matbrgz commented May 11, 2018

I've already started at https://github.com/MatheusRV/StaticSiteGeneratorBenchmarks using http://staystatic.github.io models.

Could you provide a bot that verify all https://github.com/netlify/staticgen/tree/master/content/projects and create a issue on my board? Or help me remove database from TFB? Or just help giving me steps..

@erquhart
Copy link
Contributor

I can't personally provide any support for this at the moment, but let's see if someone else in the community comes along that can - we'll leave this issue open for that purpose.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants