Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check whether salinity units should be psu or ppt #103

Closed
jkrasting opened this issue Mar 31, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Check whether salinity units should be psu or ppt #103

jkrasting opened this issue Mar 31, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jkrasting
Copy link
Contributor

@StephenGriffies agreed to check whether salinity should be expressed as psu or ppt for diagnostic output.

@adcroft
Copy link
Collaborator

adcroft commented Mar 31, 2015

From the fount of all knowledge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinity), TEOS-10 recommends use of a mass fraction (g/kg). The wiki page has this example:

A sample of seawater from most locations with a chlorinity of 19.37 ppt will have a Knudsen salinity of 35.00 ppt, a PSS-78 practical salinity of about 35.0, and a TEOS-10 absolute salinity of about 35.2 g/kg. The electrical conductivity of this water at a temperature of 15 °C is 42.9 mS/cm.

I think we are using "ppt" unless we are using TEOS-10, in which case we need to adjust all our initial conditions and analyses... :(

@StephenGriffies
Copy link
Contributor

I think we should use ppt, although not yet using TEOS-10. We are in effect ignoring the "correction" term needed for absolute salinity. With ppt, we can then sensibly state that the total salt content of the ocean is the salinity integrated over the ocean. Likewise, we can accept the mass of salt exchanged with sea ice.

So in summary, we should remove "psu" in favor of "ppt".

@StephenGriffies
Copy link
Contributor

The OMDP document for CMIP6 says the salinity units are "1e-3". That is, they should be "ppt". I will start to make the changes in the diagnostic registers for salinity diagnostics that I find.

nikizadehgfdl pushed a commit to nikizadehgfdl/MOM6 that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2017
gustavo-marques pushed a commit to gustavo-marques/MOM6 that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2019
Hallberg-NOAA pushed a commit to marshallward/MOM6 that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2022
Remove the pointer attribute from tides_CS in its parent CS in unsplit
mode. This recovers tidal forcing functionality in the unsplit mode.
ashao pushed a commit to ashao/MOM6 that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2022
Remove the pointer attribute from tides_CS in its parent CS in unsplit
mode. This recovers tidal forcing functionality in the unsplit mode.
MJHarrison-GFDL pushed a commit to MJHarrison-GFDL/MOM6 that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2022
…o_master_merge

Merge FMS dev/master into master 08August2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants