Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to measure the consistency across multiple views, rather than just between a pair of views? #3

Open
MiaApr opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@MiaApr
Copy link

MiaApr commented Feb 7, 2025

No description provided.

@mohammadasim98
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thank you for taking an interest in our work.

Currently, we only consider 2 images at a time. Ideally, for multiple views, you need to compute all possible combinations, i.e., nC2 where n is the total number of images, and then take the average. However this becomes inefficient if n is larger.

In that case, if you have an ordered sequence of images, then you can perform a pairwise evaluation as done in the original paper, where you compute MEt3R in a sliding window fashion and then take the average. this I more efficient as compared to dense evaluation and proved to be sufficient for comparing different level of inconsistencies.

In case the images are not ordered, then you can define a set of fixed pairs (not necessarily all combinations, but make sure that there are overlaps between pairs) and evaluate MEt3R on these. Then, for comparing methods, use the same set of pairs for fairness.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants