You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The changes all appear sensible enough to me, with the exception of the Device Access Control policy. I don't understand what we're trying to achieve with this one, as it seems to fly in the opposite direction of a Zero Trust architecture. I can see circumstances where it's important to control which devices can be on a given bearer network (such as in the prison context, and we have text in our WiFi policy along these lines). I think I must be missing something!
Further to our chat earlier, I think I can refine my question on this. The policy talks about a "protected network" - but this term doesn't seem to be defined. So if it's all MoJ networks then my question above applies; if it's a subset of MoJ networks, then depending on what the subset is, all may be well in the world.
Hello @L-Crosby and @cybersquirrel
Following feedback and updates, the access control material has been revised and updated. Previews of the material are available as follows:
Please may I request a review of these updates?
A full set of the changes introduced may be previewed here.
Many thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: