Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request review of access control policy updates #349

Open
warmanaMOJ opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Request review of access control policy updates #349

warmanaMOJ opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@warmanaMOJ
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @L-Crosby and @cybersquirrel

Following feedback and updates, the access control material has been revised and updated. Previews of the material are available as follows:

Please may I request a review of these updates?

A full set of the changes introduced may be previewed here.

Many thanks.

@cybersquirrel
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @warmanaMOJ,

The changes all appear sensible enough to me, with the exception of the Device Access Control policy. I don't understand what we're trying to achieve with this one, as it seems to fly in the opposite direction of a Zero Trust architecture. I can see circumstances where it's important to control which devices can be on a given bearer network (such as in the prison context, and we have text in our WiFi policy along these lines). I think I must be missing something!

Jon.

@cybersquirrel
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,

Further to our chat earlier, I think I can refine my question on this. The policy talks about a "protected network" - but this term doesn't seem to be defined. So if it's all MoJ networks then my question above applies; if it's a subset of MoJ networks, then depending on what the subset is, all may be well in the world.

Thank you!

Jon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants