Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FPS Reported In Paper #3

Open
ghost opened this issue Mar 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

FPS Reported In Paper #3

ghost opened this issue Mar 4, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 4, 2020

Hello,

Many thanks for this excellent work! I was very impressed by your first Pseudo-LiDAR paper and now your team's idea to include a 4-beam LiDAR is really sensible .... just makes sense.

The runtime in the paper is reported at 90 ms/frame on a single GPU but the specs of the GPU are not reported.

Would you mind to share which GPU you used to obtain the 90 ms/frame reported in the paper?

You mentioned some CUDA improvements, did you run any experiments with CUDA improvements (not reported in the paper)?

I am curious what would be an acceptable frame rate for a real autonomous driving scenario? A single GPU would get ca. 11 frames/second essentially, have you guys tried multiple GPU's? Or anything similar not reported in the paper to keep things simple?

I re-produced the first PL paper using your AnyNet implementation for disp estimation and saw a dramatic improvement in processing speed with limited (although at times noticeable) difference.

I am looking forward to doing this same again here. Hopefully the L# idea can really make up that difference for AnyNet and still be efficient for embedded platforms

@Jinyong-Huang
Copy link

the paper report is just GDC algorithm runs in 90 ms/frame using a single GPU.

@mileyan
Copy link
Owner

mileyan commented Jun 23, 2020

Hi @tareeqav ,

It is good to know that you are using AnyNet on PL framework. As @Jinyong-Huang points, 90ms/frame is the GDC algorithm speed. The whole PL++ pipeline will take more than 500ms per frame. Looking forward to your amazing work.

@Mamoanwar97
Copy link

Hello @mileyan and @tareeqav

I am trying to do a similar thing to reproduce a pipeline similar to pseudo lidar repo with Anynet. we now trained the anynet on the kitti object dataset but the resulted point cloud is not clean as either of this pseudo lidar or pseudo lidar ++

Anynet point cloud output:
anynet_output

Psmnet point cloud output:
psmnet_output

as you see both are almost the same except for the noise around the car in Anynet point cloud, so do you have any idea how to improve anynet output? @tareeqav did you make any changes to anynet model to fit in the pipeline? or do you know if there is any filtering algorithm that can help in removing this noise?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants