Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
I am not sure I quite understand your setup. Can you be more specific, or perhaps have a diagram to better explain this new concept? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am still a bit confused about your setup. What are your objective function, design variables, and constraints? What is the relationship between the top and bottom of the picture you posted? Are you trying to change the shape for the top or the bottom airfoil? Are you trying to reduce the drag for the top airfoil, or maximize the lift for the bottom one? Are these two airfoils represent different working conditions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, sorry for the confusion. The top is the standard airfoil, while the bottom is a co-flow jet airfoil. my focus is on the co-flow jet. Co-flow jet has part of its top surface shifted down and there's 2 slots with fixed mass flow jet as boundary condition. I've different obj but let's say I'm trying to maximize the cl/cd ratio of a co-flow jet, as shown at the bottom pic, by changing its shape. So maybe best shape for max cl/cd in 10,000 iterations. The operating conditions like inflow vel etc are fixed, except for the airfoil shape, which changes as DAFoam optimizes I supposed. I don't think DAFoam can optimize this co-flow jet jet directly. So is it possible to let DAFoam change the shape of the org airfoil, then I insert a code to shift the top surface down to convert it to a co-flow jet, then DAFoam or OpenFOAM take over again to deform the grid and run the simulation. This process is then repeated. Hope it's clearer now. Thanks for the help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Based on your description, I believe DAFoam can directly optimize the co-flow jet airfoil. There is no need to first optimize the original airfoil and then manually shift down the top surface. Let me know if you have any concerns about directly optimizing the bottom airfoil. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Oh that's great! I have attached another diagram. So to be more precise, is it possible to change and optimize only the shape along the blue line, while keeping red slot region length fixed and perpendicular to its adjacent region, as shown? If so, what tutorial should I follow to achieve this? Thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, you can directly optimize the co-jet airfoil. Then, you need to impose two constraints: the first is to enforce the length of the slot and the other is to ensure orthogonality. Unfortunately, these two constraints are not in pyGeo yet. We can implement it, but it may take a while due to the limited manpower. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I'm thinking of using DAFoam for my optimization problem but I'm not sure if it would work. I am trying to optimize co-jet flow airfoil.. So the thing is that the airfoil geometry is slight modified with part of the top suction side being lower and there's coming out and going into the slots. In essense, I need to:
Btw, in my problem, I also need to impose constant mass rate or velocity or total/static pressure at the injection and suction slot.
So can I use DAFoam? Key thing is tt I need to modify the airfoil coordinates again after DAFoam has modified the airfoil. Another thing is the BC.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions