Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We need a better way of picking the user(s) to name an anonymous room for (SPEC-267) #124

Open
matrixbot opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels
A-Client-Server Issues affecting the CS API enhancement A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member

When a room has no explicit name or canonical alias, we name it after the members of the room ("Alice and Bob", "Alice and 3 others", etc).

We would like this name to be stable and consistent across clients. We need an algorithm to pick the right users.

(Imported from https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-267)

(Reported by @richvdh)

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Jira watchers: @richvdh

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

matrixbot commented Nov 5, 2015

Links exported from Jira:

relates to matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#688

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Naming the room after the first user(s) to be invited is attractive, but

  • we don't have that information in the data model currently
  • it's not well-defined in the case of a branched event graph.

-- @richvdh

@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title We need a better way of picking the user(s) to name an anonymous room for We need a better way of picking the user(s) to name an anonymous room for (SPEC-267) Oct 31, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot added the spec-bug Something which is in the spec, but is wrong label Nov 7, 2016
@turt2live turt2live added enhancement A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol and removed spec-bug Something which is in the spec, but is wrong labels Aug 7, 2018
@turt2live turt2live added the A-Client-Server Issues affecting the CS API label Feb 6, 2019
@richvdh richvdh transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals Mar 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Client-Server Issues affecting the CS API enhancement A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants