Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wrong sizing of \Vert with \left and \right #2697

Closed
mbotsch opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

wrong sizing of \Vert with \left and \right #2697

mbotsch opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Accepted Issue has been reproduced by MathJax team Fixed Test Needed v3 v3.2
Milestone

Comments

@mbotsch
Copy link

mbotsch commented May 19, 2021

Issue Summary

Sizing \Vert with \left and \right does not work properly after switching to version 3.1.4.

Steps to Reproduce:

Try the following, e..g, on the demo page https://www.mathjax.org/#demo

$$\left\Vert V \right\Vert$$

Left and right Vert should be the same size, but the right one is smaller or (depending where this is in a complex equation) both Verts are too small. This used to work in version 3.1.2. In contrast, using \vert instead of \Vert works as expected.

Technical details:

  • MathJax Version: 3.1.4, SVG output
  • Client OS: Mac OS X 10.15.7.
  • Browser: latest Chrome, Firefox, Safari
@pkra
Copy link
Contributor

pkra commented May 19, 2021

Will be fixed via mathjax/MathJax-src#700

@dpvc dpvc added Accepted Issue has been reproduced by MathJax team Ready for Review Test Needed v3 labels May 19, 2021
@dpvc dpvc added Merged Merged into develop branch and removed Ready for Review labels May 24, 2021
@dpvc dpvc added this to the 3.2 milestone Jun 16, 2021
@dpvc dpvc added Fixed v3.2 and removed Merged Merged into develop branch labels Jul 6, 2021
@dpvc dpvc closed this as completed Jul 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Accepted Issue has been reproduced by MathJax team Fixed Test Needed v3 v3.2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants