You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a question that could lead to an actual issue.
Was it intentional to return a JSON representation of the Mapbox vector tile when requesting for format type "json"? See this line.
Or should that toJSON be replaced with toGeoJSONSync?
If the current implementation is correct then is there a design or requirements reason for it? My amateur understanding is that .mvt is provided as a protobuf and made for rendering. I'd imagine viz libraries expects it in pbf so what good is a JSON representation?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a question that could lead to an actual issue.
Was it intentional to return a JSON representation of the Mapbox vector tile when requesting for format type "json"? See this line.
Or should that
toJSON
be replaced withtoGeoJSONSync
?If the current implementation is correct then is there a design or requirements reason for it? My amateur understanding is that
.mvt
is provided as a protobuf and made for rendering. I'd imagine viz libraries expects it in pbf so what good is a JSON representation?Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: