You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
BoundingRegion api doesn't know about tolerance. In the first implementation that we have, BoundingBox asks for tolerance in its constructor.
Question is, would it be better to request tolerance only in the methods? This will imply recognizing from the BoundingRegion's api that tolerance is requested when calling the methods.
Probably the most related use-case is that this package in general, maliput will be used and when objects are being constructed there won't be possible to call maliput::api::RoadGeometry::linear_tolerance() in order to match tolerances, as probably the RoadNetwork won't be ready to be queried yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
Comes from this PR comment.
BoundingRegion
api doesn't know about tolerance. In the first implementation that we have,BoundingBox
asks for tolerance in its constructor.Question is, would it be better to request tolerance only in the methods? This will imply recognizing from the BoundingRegion's api that tolerance is requested when calling the methods.
Probably the most related use-case is that this package in general,
maliput
will be used and when objects are being constructed there won't be possible to callmaliput::api::RoadGeometry::linear_tolerance()
in order to match tolerances, as probably the RoadNetwork won't be ready to be queried yet.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: