Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Notice: getimagesize(): Read error! in app/code/Magento/Catalog/Model/Product/Image.php on line 949 #2276

Closed
gigadesign1 opened this issue Nov 6, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels
bug report Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed

Comments

@gigadesign1
Copy link

According to documentation, the etc/view.xml is optional when inheriting from a parent theme.
I am inhereting from Magento/blank, so I did not create this file. It gave me this error in developer mode, in default mode the products just won't be displayed.

When I copy and paste the etc/view.xml file from the parent theme, the error is gone and everything works as expected.

Like this issue #1647

@maghamed
Copy link
Contributor

maghamed commented Nov 6, 2015

Thanks, for your feedback. Internal issue number for current bug - MAGETWO-45125

@maghamed
Copy link
Contributor

Fix delivered to mainline, @gigadesign1 could you please verify this fix on your branch and let us know whether we fixed it?

@Enelar
Copy link

Enelar commented Oct 26, 2016

@magento-team catched it on 1.13.0.2, on zero length file

@spyrule
Copy link

spyrule commented Jan 19, 2017

This problem persists in version 2.1.3

@versdivers
Copy link

Got this error in default mode while compiling catalog:images:resize on 2.2.0

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed label Oct 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug report Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants