Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No license provided #27

Open
awsdert opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

No license provided #27

awsdert opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@awsdert
Copy link

awsdert commented Mar 6, 2019

Judging by the lack of license I'm guessing MIT is gonna be your choice but it is still better for clarity, incidentally are you going for GCC compatibility at all? Would make an interesting drop in replacement for it when compiling the linux kernel. btw I also made my own replacement to make/nmake/gnumake (hated their poor syntax), I've yet to successfully compile kernel code linux mint which I'm on but it works fine for user land code (just look via my profile if you're interested), just not got a solid api just yet.

@m-schmoock
Copy link
Owner

Hey, the lua module iteself containse the MIT license and the Readme points that out.
I do not really maintain the module anymore, it has be forked and further developed by other people.

@awsdert
Copy link
Author

awsdert commented Mar 7, 2019

Ah kk, just seemed like there was none since it didn't show on the github project like normally see, would be a good idea to just add it anyway for quick identification, no need to change the readme when doing this since there is no clash

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants