Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Take advantage of assumes on x * x (with nuw) #122412

Open
scottmcm opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Take advantage of assumes on x * x (with nuw) #122412

scottmcm opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@scottmcm
Copy link

scottmcm commented Jan 10, 2025

Rust stabilized its isqrt method today, so I was looking at its codegen.

The output for

let root = u16::isqrt(num);

currently has a manual

assume(root <= 255)

I was thinking that it'd be nice to give LLVM a bit more specific information, like

assume(root * root <= num)

since that's (a partial) definition of what isqrt does, and strictly more specific.

Sadly, that assume today doesn't seem to be worth bothering adding, since opt seems like it doesn't take advantage of it even in a "simple" situation that doesn't need to know anything about num: https://llvm.godbolt.org/z/zoq4T5fKr

But Alive2 confirms that it would be allowed to https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ko8HYR

define i1 @src(i16 noundef %num, i16 noundef %s) noundef zeroext {
start:
  %_4 = mul nuw i16 noundef %s, noundef %s
  %cond = icmp ule i16 %_4, noundef %num
  assume i1 %cond
  %_0 = icmp ult i16 noundef %s, 256
  ret i1 %_0
}
=>
define i1 @tgt(i16 noundef %num, i16 noundef %s) noundef zeroext {
start:
  ret i1 1
}
Transformation seems to be correct!

Original Rust code I used to get the LLVM IR: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/vM8qj4xjf

pub unsafe fn isqrt_facts(num: u16, s: u16) -> bool {
    std::hint::assert_unchecked(u16::unchecked_mul(s, s) <= num);
    s <= 255
}

cc rust-lang/rust#116226

@dtcxzyw
Copy link
Member

dtcxzyw commented Jan 10, 2025

We can perform this optimization in CVP/SCCP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants