You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As indicated in the linked discussion currently the resolution of branch-names to sha1s is done using provider specific API calls, for anything unsupported users must figure out the commit hash themselves.
Who would use this feature?
Anyone not using GitHub or GitLab.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You think you know a lot about Git and then something like this comes along. Every day is a school day! We should definitely add this to the "bare git repo provider". For GitHub, Gitlab.com and others where we have an API we can call I'd leave things as is. It works, it is cheap and we have a good caching setup.
For bare git repositories this will be a major usability improvement!
Follow up from https://discourse.jupyter.org/t/how-to-use-bitbucket-repositories-on-mybinder-org/1000/4
Proposed change
git ls-remote
in the bare git providerbinderhub/binderhub/repoproviders.py
Lines 126 to 160 in 0b8f99a
E.g.:
As indicated in the linked discussion currently the resolution of branch-names to sha1s is done using provider specific API calls, for anything unsupported users must figure out the commit hash themselves.
Who would use this feature?
Anyone not using GitHub or GitLab.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: