You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should add a note to extensions.md that HTML_COPY_CLIPBOARD should be NO when using Fragment Copy Button.
Other
This project page is also using Doxygen 1.10.0, yet I am not experiencing any problems. This is probably because the project uses the old Doxygen-generated header.html, which does not contain any clipboard-related code.
In Doxygen 1.10.0, the following code is added when generating header.html
I was wondering if, with the Doxygen copy button, the "Fragment Copy Button" extension still needs to exists.
If not, deprecating the extension might reduce @jothepro's maintenance load.
Hi, thanks for the great project!
I found a small problem and would like to report it.
Problem
Using the extension "Fragment Copy Button" conflicts with Doxygen copy button as shown in the screenshot.
You can see the conflict from this page. https://github.com/CaseyNelson314/doxygen-page-demo
The version I am using is Doxygen 1.10.0.
Solution
Set
HTML_COPY_CLIPBOARD
to NO in Doxyfile. The default is YES.This option was added in 1.10.0. https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/changelog.html#log_1_10_0
Suggestions
I think we should add a note to extensions.md that
HTML_COPY_CLIPBOARD
should be NO when using Fragment Copy Button.Other
This project page is also using Doxygen 1.10.0, yet I am not experiencing any problems. This is probably because the project uses the old Doxygen-generated header.html, which does not contain any clipboard-related code.
In Doxygen 1.10.0, the following code is added when generating header.html
This is a translated text. Some parts may be difficult to understand. We apologize in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: