Update readme to clarify how links can be opened #1366
Labels
effort/hours
Estimated to take one or several hours
exp/beginner
Can be confidently tackled by newcomers
exp/novice
Someone with a little familiarity can pick up
good first issue
Good issue for new contributors
help wanted
Seeking public contribution on this issue
kind/bug
A bug in existing code (including security flaws)
P1
High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up
status/ready
Ready to be worked
topic/design-content
Content design, writing, information architecture
The readme mentions
"Handle ipfs://, ipns:// and dweb: links
If you come across a link to any of the protocols above, IPFS Desktop will be able to open them and redirect them to your default browser."
but it is missing, both from here as from ipfs guides (https://docs.ipfs.io/guides), how should one proceed to open an ipfs link that is provided as text. This is a very basic feature and I fear that if I'm having this much trouble, this could scare a lot of users from further digging into ipfs. If I have an ipfs link, say, /ipns/torrent-paradise.ml, how should I proceed to open it using the ipfs-desktop application or the background daemon?
Edit: with the frontend, I'm of course able to visualize the files from a web application, but how can I open the link directly in the browser as a website? I know I could do it through cloudfare or https://ipfs.io/LINK, but these are just centralized proxy services to the actual descentralized network, so it is important to be able to open the links in the browser with some 127.0.0.1/ipfs/obj syntax. This is missing from documentation though.
Edit2: I kept randomly messing with the port numbers until I found the correct one: 8080. So, in the example given,
http://127.0.0.1:8080/ipns/<something>
typed into the browser will show the website. Although I figured it out by sheer luck, I still think it is very important to have this info in the readme. 8080 is a common port providing a "localhost" alternative for the 80 http default, but in no way should be taken as a given.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: