Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
113 lines (95 loc) · 6.13 KB

IIP_0003.md

File metadata and controls

113 lines (95 loc) · 6.13 KB

ION Improvement Proposal 0003

back to main page

IIP 0003
Title Revised block reward schedule
Author Adam Mattlack and Michael Pfeiffer
Status Draft
Type Standards track
Created 01-06-2018

Abstract

This IIP introduces a revised block reward schedule.

Plain language tl;dr

“Revised block reward schedule” — The ION blockchain will issue higher block rewards over a longer period of time.

  • Effect: Higher block rewards are designed to incentivize the direction of computing power to maintain secure blockchain protocols. This is an improvement over a protocol that drops off precipitously leaving insufficient predictable motivation to maintain a growing ecosystem that includes not only ION, but all secondary tokens on the core blockchain.

Motivation

  • Revised block reward schedule
    • This proposal adjusts the block rewards schedule so that the decline in rewards would be more gradual. Retaining higher rewards in the coming years increases the likelihood of adequate incentivization for maintaining network security, not only for ION, but also for all secondary tokens, thus protecting the viability of the ecosystems that depend upon the ION blockchain.

Specification

Block Reward Schedule

The ION White Paper (2016) specifies the following block reward schedule: Reward schedule 2016

White Paper Specification

The following chart shows a problem with the white paper specification. Notably, the Block reward is scheduled to drop off precipitously from Year 4 (5.75 ION/block) to Year 5 (1.85 ION/block). The effect potentially discourages masternode operation. Decay of the masternode network would erode the utility of the ION network, and disrupt economies built around secondary tokens.

Year ION/Block Issuance/Year Total Projected (WP spec) Inflation Rate (%) (WP spec) Total Realized + Projected Realized (4/25) Amount behind spec
1 23 12,000,000 22,900,000 177% 19,300,000 3,600,000
2 17 9,000,000 31,900,000 39.3% 27,000,000 4,900,000
3 11.5 6,000,000 37,900,000 18.8%
4 5.75 3,000,000 40,900,000 7.9%
5 1.85 1,000,000 41,900,000 2.44% Too steep
6 1.85 1,000,000 42,900,000 2.38%
7 1.85 1,000,000 43,900,000 2.33%
8 1.85 1,000,000 44,900,000 2.27%
9 1.85 1,000,000 45,900,000 2.22%
10 0.2 100,000 46,000,000 0.22% Too steep
11-100 0.2 0.22 - 0.18%

Proposed Block Reward Schedule

The proposed block reward schedule holds steady the number of new ION generated from Years 4-9. During this time period, while the block reward is static, the Inflation Rate nevertheless declines because the proportion of new coins relative to the total supply diminishes.

For the purposes of this document, “inflation” is treated as “supply inflation” and is calculated as the number of new ION generated in a year relative to the total existing supply at the beginning of the year.

Proposed White Paper Reference Realized + Proposed
Year ION/Block Issuance / Year Total Projected (White Paper spec) Inflation Rate (%)(WP spec) Total Realized + Proposed Realized Issuance/Year Realized + Projected Realized Realized/Proposed Inflation Rate
12312,000,00022,900,000110%19,300,0007,400,00067.89% Realized
2179,000,00031,900,00039.3%27,000,0008,300,00043.01% Realized
311.56,000,00037,900,00018.8%33,000,0006,000,00022.22% Projected
45.753,000,000*40,900,0007.9%36,000,0003,000,000*9.09% Projected
55.753,000,000*41,900,0002.44%39,000,0003,000,000*8.33% Projected
65.753,000,000*42,900,0002.38%42,000,0003,000,000*7.69% Projected
75.753,000,000*43,900,0002.33%45,000,0003,000,000*7.14% Projected
85.753,000,000*44,900,002.27%48,000,0003,000,000*6.66% Projected
95.753,000,000*45,900,0002.22%51,000,0003,000,000*6.25% Projected
101.901,000,00056,000,000**1.8%52,000,0001,000,000*1.96% Projected
11-1000.2100,00065,000,000*1.8%61,000,000100,0000.019% Projected to 0.016% Projected

This proposal calls for the issuance of an additional 6 million ION over the currently realized supply. The currently realized supply is about 5 million ION lower than the white paper specification. The proposed adjustment achieves the goal of incentivizing a robust masternode network without substantially increasing supply inflation.

This chart does not address the potential earnings from fees generated from the ION network and from the proposed token network. Significant transactional velocity could mean that masternode operation would be sufficiently profitable from fees alone that network generation of new ION may no longer be necessary to incentivize masternode operation.

While this proposal addresses the drop off in block rewards from Year 4 to Year 5, it does not address the drop off from Year 9 (1.85 ION/block) to Year 10 (0.2 ION/block) which is also precipitous. The proposal defers these decisions to a future vote by the ION governance once there is sufficient information about the transactional velocity of the network to estimate the incentives necessary to maintain network security and utility.