Rebased #96: Create repos for non-organizations #322
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
thank you @abitrolly for this rebase! if you plan on contributing more to this work please note i've similarly taken the original PR https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-github/pull/96 and merged w/the current state of master to create this WIP PR https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-github/pull/428. |
|
ah yes @abitrolly, good catch! I think an addition to these 2 files should help in the tests that look for the new |
|
#428 is deprecated and now the progress is being done in https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-github/milestone/8 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This needs a thorough review. I just rebased the changes to make them mergeable and solved conflicts without digging too much into how GitHub provider currently handles all parameters. Especially
func (c *Config) Client()seem wrong to me.