Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look into replacing remotes with pak for faster installation #37

Closed
cicdguy opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #38
Closed

Look into replacing remotes with pak for faster installation #37

cicdguy opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #38
Assignees

Comments

@cicdguy
Copy link
Contributor

cicdguy commented May 10, 2024

https://pak.r-lib.org/ is more performant and easier to use.

@walkowif
Copy link
Contributor

This still requires merging of this PR: insightsengineering/r.pkg.template#234

@walkowif walkowif reopened this Jun 26, 2024
@walkowif
Copy link
Contributor

walkowif commented Jul 1, 2024

Removing these lines causes problems for some packages, for example Genentech/jmpost where required packages are not installed anymore, i.e., this part of log is not present:

Installing 10 packages: listenv, future, SQUAREM, progressr, future.apply, lava, diagram, prodlim, jinjar, ggplot2.utils

and as a consequence, jinjar and ggplot2.utils are not available.

We can consider using pak::local_install_deps() in place of remotes::install_deps().

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants