Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add listeners to meshgateway spec #20082

Conversation

sarahalsmiller
Copy link
Member

Description

In order to keep the meshgateway work in line with other gateway work in consuls, we are defining a list of listeners. There will only ever be one listener defined, but defining the spec this way will allow the meshgateway to be more easily programable in the future.

Testing & Reproduction steps

  • Struct updates only. Make sure the fields are updated correctly and CI/Lint pass

Links

-->

PR Checklist

  • updated test coverage
  • external facing docs updated
  • [ X ] appropriate backport labels added
  • [ X ] not a security concern

@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller added theme/mesh-gw Track mesh gateway work pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry pr/no-backport labels Jan 4, 2024
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller requested a review from a team January 4, 2024 17:55
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2024 17:55
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller enabled auto-merge (squash) January 4, 2024 18:07
…-consume-for-Service' of github.com:hashicorp/consul into NET-6822-consul-consul-k8s-Add-listeners-to-MeshGateway-consume-for-Service
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller merged commit a820e9a into main Jan 4, 2024
85 checks passed
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller deleted the NET-6822-consul-consul-k8s-Add-listeners-to-MeshGateway-consume-for-Service branch January 4, 2024 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr/no-backport pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry theme/mesh-gw Track mesh gateway work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants