Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Nodes inappropriately charging ERT 0.0.57 tiny fee for hourly exchange rate updates #44

Closed
tinker-michaelj opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Nodes inappropriately charging ERT 0.0.57 tiny fee for hourly exchange rate updates #44

tinker-michaelj opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@paulmadsenhed @tinker-michaelj
Labels
Bug An error that causes the feature to behave differently than what was expected based on design. P1 High priority issue, which must be completed in the milestone otherwise the release is at risk. Release Note Issues which need a release note created.

Comments

@tinker-michaelj
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of the defect
The exchange rate admin (0.0.57) is being charged the transaction record storage fee for the FileUpdates of the exchange rate file 0.0.112.

Suggested resolution
Stop charging this fee.
@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj added Bug An error that causes the feature to behave differently than what was expected based on design. P1 High priority issue, which must be completed in the milestone otherwise the release is at risk. Release Note Issues which need a release note created. labels May 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@paulmadsenhed paulmadsenhed

@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj

Labels
Bug An error that causes the feature to behave differently than what was expected based on design. P1 High priority issue, which must be completed in the milestone otherwise the release is at risk. Release Note Issues which need a release note created.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@paulmadsenhed @tinker-michaelj