You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There have been quite a lot of discussion on the methodological weakness of this paper following its release on bioRxiv. The Race and Ethnicity chapter was particularly controversial, for example mixing it with religious terms was clearly an important error. Therefore, even if interesting, the technology proposed in the paper has still to mature to produce reliable results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the use of affiliations to detect countries for authors is a major improvement. Also we should consider refitting the nationality / name-origin model based on exactly the categories we'd like to analyze. I think this would address this reviewer's comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: