Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expanding the scope to include public health policy / epidemiology #36

Closed
rdvelazquez opened this issue Mar 24, 2020 · 12 comments
Closed
Labels
Discussion Topics we'd love feedback on!

Comments

@rdvelazquez
Copy link
Collaborator

rdvelazquez commented Mar 24, 2020

Should this review paper also explicitly address public health policy / epidemiology? Is there a critical mass of folks who can help manage contributions in this area?

Some specific subtopics that a section like this could address are listed in the comment below.

@rdvelazquez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rdvelazquez commented Mar 24, 2020

Potential topics could include (the papers are just from a brief google scholar search to get a rough idea of what research may be available):

I don't personally have expertise in this area but I've seen it play a huge role in the response to COVID-19 and find it hard to understand what the research actually says about these topics. If there are others with expertise in this area who would like to contribute... here's your invitation.

@rando2 rando2 added the Discussion Topics we'd love feedback on! label Mar 24, 2020
@rando2
Copy link
Contributor

rando2 commented Mar 24, 2020

Hi @rdvelazquez , Thank you for opening this issue for people to discuss ideas! I think some of your proposed topics might be related to an open issue and an open pull request we have right now, #20 and #22 . Feedback would be much appreciated!

@rdvelazquez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @rando2, Thanks for taking a look at this! I missed #20 and #22 when originally looking into this; they both look good! I think the diagnostics section is a good place to discuss practical considerations for testing. If a section eventually gets added regarding public health policy some of that information could be moved at that point if warranted.

@rdvelazquez rdvelazquez changed the title Expanding the scope to areas outside therapeutics and diagnostics Expanding the scope to other areas [public health policy / epidemiology] Mar 25, 2020
@adamlmaclean
Copy link
Collaborator

I think a section on population dynamics could be valuable -- overlapping with several of the bullets mentioned by @rdvelazquez above: covers prediction of transmission dynamics (see #69), and potential guidelines/strategies for contact tracing, may also touch upon demographics (though with more complicated models).

@cgreene
Copy link
Member

cgreene commented Mar 26, 2020

@nolankav - just saw your introduction over in #17 and I wonder if you want to join this conversation

@rdvelazquez rdvelazquez changed the title Expanding the scope to other areas [public health policy / epidemiology] Expanding the scope to include public health policy / epidemiology Mar 26, 2020
@rdvelazquez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FYI - I've narrowed the scope of this issue (changed the tile and intro comment) to help keep things organized. It's now specifically addressing expanding the scope for public health policy / epidemiology rather than any proposed expansion of scope.

@nolankav
Copy link
Collaborator

There's a potential angle on SES/income how it complicates social distancing (e.g. if you live paycheck-to-paycheck, you're less likely to distance). This could support targeted, cost-effective policies and economic interventions for reducing transmission.

Or are socioeconomic considerations beyond the scope of the paper?

Also worth discussing ethical issues regarding testing and policy interventions. Tracing movements is less socially acceptable in the West than in China, for example.

Can take a look at other angles, too.

@adamlmaclean
Copy link
Collaborator

Re: discussion of epidemiology & population dynamics - I'd be happy to draft a section on this. Several modeling works (including #69 and #109) provide useful estimates of R_0, R_t, and the effects of social distancing.

it seems that this can either belong to its own section of fit within Pathogenesis.md under the heading "Viral Replication, Spreading and Transmission" or elsewhere? Ok to start by drafting this within the Pathogenesis section, and move later if better?

@rando2
Copy link
Contributor

rando2 commented Mar 29, 2020

Hi @alavendelm , that sounds great to me! Thank you so much for taking the lead on this! It shouldn't be too hard to move it later if we decide it fits better somewhere else.

@rdvelazquez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Quick update on level of interest:

Four people have expressed interest or suggested related papers: @alavendelm, @nolankav, @rando2, @cbrueffer

Five paper's have been suggested / summarized:
#69 - Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modeling study
#103 - Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2)
#104 - Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1
#109 - Potential roles of social distancing in mitigating the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in South Korea
#114 - Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand

Seems like the current approach is to include these areas in background or pathogenesis and then move to their own section later if needed, which makes sense to me.

I'll let the maintainers and contributors take it from here but I'm more than happy to help with organization / administrative things and will keep an eye on this issue in the next few weeks.

@adamlmaclean
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @rdvelazquez. I am working on a section on transmission for the background, covering #69, #103, and #109.

Here not covering #104 and #114 -- these probably fit best elsewhere.

@rdvelazquez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this now. There is a section on reproduction number and some of these other items were touched on in the intro.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Topics we'd love feedback on!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants